Northern Korea removes portraits Marx and Lenin

Northern Korea reportedly removes portraits of Marx and Lenin

(llco.org)

Huge portraits of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin used to gaze out over Kim Il-sung Square in Pyongyang, northern Korea. It is being reported that the communist leaders have been removed from the important ceremonial space. Notably, the square is one of the most photographed spaces in northern Korea, a place for state gatherings,  a tourist site, and space for displays of military might. Early this year, a giant Kim Jong-il statue was added beside the  famous Kim Il-Sung one, father of the current leader next to grandfather who founded the dynasty. The removal of the communist leaders Marx and Lenin sends a message about the nature of the northern Korean regime.

The northern Korean one was never much of a communist-led regime even when it aligned with the socialist (and also revisionist) blocs. Even though Stalin had a hand in shaping certain northern Korean policies, the regime was ideologically very far removed from its Soviet and Chinese allies. Although the regime projected socialism to its external allies when it felt that it needed to, its leadership had little interest in Marxism.  Neither was the regime mainly led by the theories of Juche, long-winded writings attributed to Kim Il-sung that were used to pad the Great Leader’s resume. Since the 80s, the regime has phased out Marxist window dressing from official documents, gradually replacing it with Juche curtains. Since Marxist-Leninist allies, or even revisionist ones pretending to be Marxist-Leninist, are few and far between nowadays, it makes less and less sense for northern Korea to continue to praise two founders of modern communism. It is not surprising that the portraits have been taken down, it is surprising they remained up so long. The Marxist pretense does the regime little good.

There is speculation that changes are afoot. Some say there is a turn by Kim Jong-un away from his father Kim Jong-il’s military-first policies. His father Kim Jong-il’s policies had privileged the military over other sectors of society. They resulted in austerity for the general public. Some speculate that his son, the current leader, Kim Jong-un’s policies may move toward policies that put the economy first, give less privilege to the military, and move away from austerity. Recently, it is reported that the young leader has developed a style that is a bit different than his departed father. Some have speculated that he is emulating his grandfather, Kim Il-Sung, the  dynasty’s founder. Others have pointed out that his wife has recently been photographed in designer labels. For a regime that puts so much emphasis on public image, it is hard to imagine that being photographed in Christian Dior would be accidental. Whether it means the regime is sending a signal about opening up or a toning down its anti-Western rhetoric something entirely different? Who knows? The regime has long experimented with special, free-market economic zones. These special economic zones are like similar neoliberal experiments elsewhere. They allow foreign investors to exploit northern Korea’s labor and resources without having to bother with as much labor and environmental regulations. Northern Korea has also long gained from black-market trade with China’s capitalist economy. And, the regime has long received foreign aid, including large amounts of US aid.

In many countries that retain a monarchy, the monarchy has little or severely limited powers — the monarch may perform symbolic functions, fulfill various technical roles and duties relating to the state. By contrast, the northern Korean monarch is not simply a figurehead, but has real political power. The Kim family too has real political power. Monarchy is a system where political power is tied to bloodline, usually inherited by a son as in northern Korea. While the imperialist media often refers to the northern Korean regime as “the last Stalinist country,” “socialist,” or “communist,” the reality is very different. Socialism and communism are about eliminating all oppression. Communist is about eliminating distinctions and hierarchies that lead to one group having power over another. Communism is about equality.

The northern Korean system is one where power passes from father to son, where the son, literally, inherits political power. It is a system where bloodline determines who is and who is not the leader. In northern Korea, Kim Il-sung passed power to his son Kim Jong-il who passed power to his son Kim Jong-un who currently is the top leader. Similar criticisms can be made of how power has passed in revisionist Cuba from Fidel Castro to his brother Raúl. Such a criticism can also be made of Mao’s wife Jiang Qing’s desire to inherit power from Mao. Although, in these latter cases, there is more justification than there is for the northern Korean monarchy. In Jiang Qing’s case, for example, she was a political figure in her own right and her political line was certainly better than the capitalist ones that surrounded her. The lines that opposed her ended up fully restoring capitalism in China. However, on a side note, even if she had inherited Mao’s power, it is highly unlikely she would have been able to avoid capitalist counter-revolution. Once Vice Chairman and Defense Minister Lin Biao was killed in 1971, the communists lost control of the people’s army. And the mass movements had ended by 1969. And, without the army under communist control, there was not going to be another Cultural Revolution. By the 1970s, especially after Lin Biao’s, and later Mao’s, deaths, there was little hope of stopping the capitalist counter-revolution. In any case, the Castro and Jiang Qing cases certainly do not represent anything close to the institutionalized monarchy that exists in northern Korea. Monarchies and familial-based political systems are ultimately incompatible with the egalitarian spirit of socialism and communism. Leadership should be determined by the correct political line, ability to implement and advance it, track record, willingness to sacrifice, courage, caring, other revolutionary virtues, etc., not by bloodline. Instead of looking to bloodlines to save humanity, communists look to the masses armed with, led by the most advanced revolutionary science, Leading Light Communism.

The masses will rally to Leading Lights. The masses will choose pure water over dirty water when given the opportunity. Real, true communist leaders should be recognized as the heroes they are. To be a communist, a Leading Light, means willing to give your life for humanity. It means carrying our shared future on your shoulders. Leading Lights live and die for the revolution. Leading Lights should be upheld, recognized as great examples to follow. Leaders are are part of pulling history forward. It is so important to not fall into petty-bourgeois, anarchist, First Worldist ways of thinking that reject leadership as a matter of principle. Such thinking betrays the revolution to the enemy. However, the approach to leadership in northern Korea errs in the other direction. While leaders can play very important roles historically, the focus on individuals to the exclusion or near exclusion of everything else is contrary to historical materialism. To understand history as merely a series of battles by good guys and bad guys, even if communist leaders versus capitalist leaders, is a version of the Great Man Theory of History. The gigantic personality cult around the Kim dynasty is completely contrary to the communist understanding that the masses make history, or as the Maoists used to say, “the masses are the real heroes.” The northern Korean approach to leadership is religious. On occasion, one can see this in the magical attributes that are given to the dynasty by state media. Not only is it completely contrary to a scientific understanding of the world, but such narratives reduce the masses to the role of children. By contrast, communists seek to elevate everyone to become leaders. Real Leading Lights advance others to become Leading Lights. The northern Korean cult does not.

Even though the regime in northern Korea is not socialist nor communist-led, it must be defended against attacks from the imperialists. Its right to defend itself should be upheld by all revolutionaries. The imperialists are arch-hypocrites in their dealings with northern Korea. The imperialists, especially the United States, have waged more wars against the people of the world than anyone else. They have more weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles, than anyone else. The United States is the only country to have used nuclear weapons on people. Two times, the United States wiped out whole cities filled with civilians. Yet the United States set themselves up as global policeman. They bully the northern Korean regime. When it defends itself, the imperialists claim it is a “rouge state,” part of an “axis of evil,” “terrorist,” etc. The main enemy in the world is imperialism — do not forget! It is imperative for communists to defend northern Korea against the imperialists. At the same time, it is necessary for communists to be very clear and honest with the proletariat. It is absolutely necessary to point out Leading Lights from fakes of various kinds. If we are to ever rebuild the international communist movement, then we can’t be afraid to call out revisionism. In other words, critical support should be extended to all those resisting imperialism. In other words, communists should support all those fighting imperialism, while at the same time, communists should contend for leadership. Leading Light advances the policy: “Uphold the broad united front! Hold the Red Flag high!”

Sources

http://www.nknews.org/2012/10/kim-il-sung-square-gets-a-new-look-2/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/northkorea/9608048/Lenin-and-Karl-Marx-statues-removed-from-North-Koreas-Kim-Il-sung-Square.html

5 Comments + Add Comment

  • Most FWers pick ideology like they pick ice cream from Baskin Robins. It is a game to them: ML, MLM, Nationalism, Juche, Zapatismo, a little of this, a little of that. Then it is time for ideological windowdressing. They are not serious. It is a game to them. It is like D & D for them. They embrace the DPRK not for any real reason. It is more like how FWers get religion: Zen, Hinduism, Wicca, a little of this, a little of that. Personal narrative is what it comes down to in the end for them, not serious investigation.

    The LLCO is based on reality. The Leading Lights ruthlessly go where reality demands — even when it is uncomfotable, but that is why they are the real leaders of the communist movement. They make the hard choices and say the hard things, but that is what real leadership is. It is revolutionary science in command. The LLCO is the only organization that I see today making real contributions. The work here is so ahead of its time. Revisionism blinds but in time these thing will work themselves out. As the LLCO writes, education is uneven. Time is on our side. It will become clearer and clearer that the LLCO is the true Communist Party.

  • North Korea is Antiimperialist but not Socialist. It’s a type of State Capitalism that is more akin to Monarchy than “typical” State Capitalism as witnessed in Yugoslavia, China etc. Nevertheless N Korea does belong in the Proggressive Camp along with Iran, Venezuela, Syria. Anyone who is not an imperialist and stands up to an imperialist power belongs in the Camp of Proggress, even if he were a reversed racist like Malema.

  • i have problem to believe this.if it true than its too bad .2 bad parts of north korea is its power inheritance and human worshiping.after kim jong il north korea is trying to go offtrack.i don’t think source of news telegraph.co.uk is trustable media.communism can’t be ended by destroying 1,2 statutes of great leaders.long live communism long live communists long live marxism,long live leninism,long live maoism….workers and peasants of the world unite…

  • Check the sources the claim is mostly false. NKnews claims the info comes from the Telegraph, the Telegraph claims the info comes from NKnews. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYpwlDrXLLw

    • This is what probably happened:

      This story appeared on NKnews talking about portraits being removed: http://www.nknews.org/2012/10/kim-il-sung-square-gets-a-new-look-2/

      Then, some other media outlets picked up on the story, but erred in reporting it. Probably what happened is they googled “Kim Il-sung square,” saw the statues in the square. Then they probably made the false assumption the portraits were the statues or it was talking about both.

      This is not some plot to undermine the support of northern Korea by tiny, insignificant grouplets by pinning the northern Korean state as revisionist. In fact, the imperialists would prefer northern Korea keep up the portraits. The imperialists have made an industry out of falsely portraying northern Korea as “the last Stalinist regime” ad nauseam. They have no interest in humanizing it by making it non-communist. Bad reporting, yes. Media plot, no. In any case, it would be easy to debunk the story as corrected. Since it is one of the most photographed sites in Korea, just find recent photos of the square with the portraits. We have corrected the story on the statues. The article now talks of the portraits being removed until we have reason to think otherwise. Thank you for the correction. Always appreciated.

Deja un comentario / Leave a comment / Mag-iwan ng komento / Hinterlasse einen Kommentar / Αφήστε ένα σχόλιο

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Contact the Leading Light

Want to join the struggle? Have a question? Do not be afraid to contact us. Email llco at llco.org

Leading Light Essentials


 

Archives